Talk:Katharine, Duchess of Kent

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

It is incorrect to refer to the eldest son of The Duke of Kent as The Earl of St. Andrews. The correct form of address for this courtesy title is the Earl of St. Andrews.

- it is however correct to begin a sentence with a capitalised word. Astrotrain 14:51, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

-- but a colon does not end a sentence...

  • yes, but usually, on a new line, you would begin with a capital. Astrotrain 20:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • We all by now understand that George Windsor, is not THE Earl of St. Andrews, that title still belongs to his father. But the sentence does look weird with a lower case the, especially as his sister is listed as The Lady Helen and his brother is The Lord Nicholas. Prsgoddess187 20:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed move for this article and for other articles on Wives of Royal Peers see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (names and titles). Mac Domhnaill

  • I have reverted from the previous version which talks about newspaper reports that the Duke and Duchess of Kent are to divorce. I could not find any authoritive source on these rumours. I would not say the Sun or Daily Mirror are appropiate sources for an encyclopedia. If it becomes official, then it can be reinstated. Astrotrain 22:18, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

The Duchess of Kent is best known for her conversion to Roman Catholicism, the first senior royal to do so since the passing of the Act of Settlement 1701.

To what extent is this really true? Ena of Battenberg converted to Catholicism, and she was the niece of Edward VII...Given that the term "senior royal" has no real meaning, I'm not sure this statement should be in there. john k 07:42, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The first person with the style and title of HRH then? I don't think Ena would be classed as a British royal? Astrotrain 20:53, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

All the talk of "relinquishing" the style Her Royal Highness isn't right. Styles are determined wholly by the Queen — one can't just decide one doesn't have a particular style any more. In the Duchess's case, nothing official has happened, and so she continues to have that style, regardless of whether she uses or wants it. The articles equates her with Princess Patricia of Connaught, but official documents were actually issued effecting Patricia's relinquishment, so the situations aren't at all the same. Also, saying that she expresses a preference for being formally styled "Katharine, Duchess of Kent" implies that she has a choice in the matter. Perhaps we can say she has said she would prefer to be styled that, but, as with HRH, she is "The Duchess of Kent" unless something official says otherwise. Proteus (Talk) 22:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be changed to reflect the fact that The Duchess of Kent remains a Royal Highness. There isn't even any citation to reflect that she actually made the choice to not use the style. Additionally, she can't style herself as anything. Royal titles are directly the perview of the Queen and the The Queen still uses HRH The Duchess of Kent. Until an offical statement is made by The Queen that HRH The Duchess of Kent has lost ths style of Royal Highness then she sould continue to be addressed by it. She cannot style herself as Katherine, Duchess of Kent until she and The Duke actually divorce until then she has no choice in the matter.

Queen Brandissima


I changed the reference to "Princess Diana" to read Diana, Princess of Wales. Diana was never ever Princess Diana. I also changed the "relinquish" part to chose not to use. She cannot relinquish the style even if she wanted to.

Queen Brandissima

BLP issues[edit]

There are major BLP issues in the section that deals with the subject's health. What might be the source of those allegations of "not again"? Has the subject gone public with her health issues? Sources sorely needed. JFW | T@lk 11:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

marital problems[edit]

Any truth to the idea that the Duke and Duchess have unoffically seperated, which is one reason she uses the 'Katharine, Duchess of Kent' or "Katherine' nonsense instead of her proper Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent title? 74.69.11.229 (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120229041929/http://www.royal.gov.uk/ThecurrentRoyalFamily/TheDuchessofKent/Activitiesandinterests.aspx. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katharine, Duchess of Kent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"had an abortion"[edit]

for clarification, perhaps the article could say "had a spontaneous abortion" - abortions can be spontaneous or therapeutic.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The citation says explicitly that she 'reluctantly agreed to have an abortion. It was her own decision..' That's not a miscarriage or a stillbirth or a 'spontaneous' abortion. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:05, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

School record[edit]

She left school with a pass in oral French and a "very good" in English literature.

Does that mean 'O' level? Valetude (talk) 21:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Katharine,_Duchess_of_Kent&oldid=1207950866"