Amanda Bynes was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[2003 Kids' Choice Awards#Favorite Movie Actress|Favorite Movie Actress]] The anchor (#Favorite Movie Actress) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Unless she officially announces her retirement, she is not a "former" actress. There is a reliably sourced sentence reporting her stated plans to continue acting. Don't change without a more recent reliable source to the contrary. Wikipedia is not in the business of predicting the future. Sundayclose (talk) 19:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, a lot of things has happen since March 2021 in which we may need to revisit this topic. As much as she claims that she has plans to return as an active film and television actress, she has done very little since 2010 in this endeavor besides failing to show up for a paid public event as a paid convention speaker. Once she is able to overcome her current problems, she would need to slowly return to public life by taking small jobs that put her in front of the public (which she has yet to start) before any Hollywood producer would be willing to hire her for any future television or film project.
We can't use Wikipedia's voice to say that she is a former actress. We can only report what the reliable sources say. Bynes has never stated publicly that she will no longer act. In fact, she has stated that she wants to return to acting. So Wikipedia itself cannot state that she is a "former" actress. We can report what the reliable sources say, but not in the lead as "former actress". Someone can make a brief edit later in the article and cite these sources (making it very clear that it's not Bynes stating anything). Whether she is a "former" actress is a minor point in the context of the entire article and her entire life, so please no overkill. For that reason, I removed the sentence about return to acting from the lead. It is mentioned later in the article. Sundayclose (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is a good suggestion. Even though she is NOT a "former actress" she is definitely not an "active actress" who was only "active" between 1993 and 2010 and she will never be "active" again until someone is willing to take a huge financial risk by offering to hire her again. As an aside, can we consider her to be a "reliable source" for voicing her own future long-term plans (beyond that on what she hopes would happen and which is not the same as what she would be able to implement for whatever reason) since a court of law might be ruling on her sanity very shortly? -- 50.231.49.42 (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
She is a reliable source for what she says, as long as it's reported in a reliable source. We can report it if she states her plans, but we (nor anyone except Bynes) knows what she's thinking. Sundayclose (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Under normal conditions, I would agree with you. Unfortunately, I doubt she knows herself what she wants to do with the rest of her life let alone what she would like to eat at her next meal. For example, 5 short months ago Ms. Bynes posted a video on her official Instagram account that she had enrolled in a cosmetology school with plans to become a trained nail technician instead of returning to acting. Should the article reflect that she had made such a statement? In my opinion, the WP article should not mention this incident since I doubt those plans would ever be implemented until she is able to silence the non-constructive voices in her head. (BTW, the 2019 Good Morning America citation that is used in the WP article to report her graduation from FIDM with her future plans in the fashion industry had also labeled her as a "former actress".) -- 50.231.49.42 (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no debate that Bynes is a reliable source for what she says. If the New York Times reports that Bynes said, "I want to return to acting", that is never a matter of dispute. She said the words. Case closed. Whether or not her words are notable enough to report on Wikipedia is a separate issue from what she has said. Whether or not she knows what she's talking about is not within the purview of Wikipedia to determine. We don't decide what her mental state is. The issue here is whether she has stated either that she is retired from acting or stated that she would like to return to acting. She has not stated that she is retired, so we don't report that she is a "former" actress. We can report that reliable sources have described her as a "former actress", but we don't use Wikipedia's voice to state that she is a "former actress" because all we do is report what reliable sources say. She is a reliable source for the words that come out of her mouth. The sources you list above are reliable sources. If the lead states that she is a "former actress", we have gone beyond what Wikipedia can do. All of that being said, this is largely much ado about nothing. The article makes a brief comment that she has said she wants to return to acting (again, it's not debatable that she said those words). If someone wishes there can be an equally brief statement that she has been described by reliable sources as a "former actress". Sundayclose (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Subject is not actively in the public eye as an actress. They were under conservatorship for nearly a decade, which includes the time those statements were made. Unless someone can show enduring coverage in quality sources, these events should be left out. Slywriter (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It would be cool if you could include the activism that is currently going on for Amanda’s safety. Free Amanda Bynes 81.97.140.245 (talk) 23:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under the “mental health and substance abuse problems” section it states that Amanda Bynes has passed away. This is not true. 2603:9000:6901:E6E3:FCA2:650A:9151:7A10 (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.png){kind=small}
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Sundayclose (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Already done Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 01:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)