Talk:List of mountains in Korea

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

It appears that North Korea is flat ;-) --Kokiri 17:57, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)

In fact. North Korea is much less flat than the South. I have added some mountains of the North. The information is from Korea Review. // Wellparp 17:23, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Kwanmo Peak[edit]

The list seems to be missing Kwanmo Peak (2,540 m). Regards, RJH (talk) 02:28, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling of Units[edit]

The mountain heights are given (with one or two exceptions) using the British spelling of metres, while many of the articles use the American spelling meters. Is there a prefered way to give units when editing, for example just using m? Kellnerp (talk) 14:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seoul Mountains[edit]

The list contains major Seoul mountains with the exception of Eunbongsan(은봉산) - 81 meters, but leaves out many others between 100m to 400m in height. There is another list of Seoul mountains on wikipedia (List of mountains in Seoul) that is much more exhaustive, but at the same time includes mountains that may be in the Seoul environs without being in the city proper. Seoul itself is in a 'bowl' of mountains most of which are in this articles list. To be complete this list might want to include all the mountains inside the city limits, including mountains that have been built upon like Naksan(낙산), which has a significant historical fortress wall on it. Kellnerp (talk) 14:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of mountains in Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140815231304/http://www.invil.org/english/tourism/themeTour/mountainValley/contents.jsp?con_no=102474&page_no=1 to http://www.invil.org/english/tourism/themeTour/mountainValley/contents.jsp?con_no=102474&page_no=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]