Talk:Tibetan music

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tibetan music redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tibet High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Regional and national music

Tibetan music is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles

Untitled[edit]

Aren't "Ajia" (or Acha Tsendep) the same group as Gaoyuanhong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.147.43.94 (talk) 20:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move proposal[edit]

Move to Tibetan music ("music" should not be capitalized). Badagnani (talk) 19:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - this is the usual style of the Wikipedia John Hill (talk) 23:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

romantic chant[edit]

Under the heading, "Chant" we have: "Other styles include those unique to the various schools of Tibetan Buddhism, such as the classical music of the popular Gelugpa school, and the romantic music of the Nyingmapa, Sakyapa and Kagyupa schools.(ref)Crossley-Holland, Peter. (1976). "The Ritual Music of Tibet." The Tibet Journal. Vol. 1, Nos. 3 & 4, Autumn 1976, pp. 47-53.(/ref). Does anyone have access to his reference or know what "romantic" chant is like? It looks like it could use some elaboration or explanation here, if even in the form of expanding the footnote. This odd mention has made its way into the main article on Tibet, too, by the way. Moonsell (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda?[edit]

This article reads like propaganda with unrelated Chinese instead of Tibetan translations of words, and edits from Chinese IPs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sargasso19 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Musical instruments[edit]

Why is there no section on the musical instruments used in Tibetan music? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]