Talk:Islam in Kazakhstan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The breakdown of population of Kazakhstan into two large groups, Muslims and Russian Orthodox is based purely on nationalities (Kazakh=Muslim and Russian=Orthodox), not actual beliefs. It has the same validity as the statement that 99% of Swedes are Christians because they are whites (the real number, as far I remember, is less than 5%). This is just nonsense.

I believe that the recent surge of ranks among religious people in Kazakhstan is solely a result of 70 years of Soviet deprivation of spiritual needs. In reality, at best 10% of Kazakh are really Muslims and 10% of Russians are Orthodox. The remaining are deists who believe in some higher power, say Kudai for Kazakhs, claim to be of certain religion yet never been to mosque/church, read Quran/Bible, and follow the covenants. In fact, many do not even know the very basics of their religion.

The only time when people actually "become religious" is during funeral ceremonies, that's it. Once it's over people go back to normal.

--Ibr 13:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC): The article needs to provide some evidence on "there is strong public pressure to increase the role that faith plays in society", I personally haven't seen any.[reply]

You can't claim what somebody else's religion is. Just because somebody doesn't seem to go to church/mosque often doesn't mean they don't consider themselves to be a Christian or Muslim. And if a survey/census says only 5% of the population goes to church you can't conclude 5% are Christians. BTW I'm wondering why the % of Muslims increased 10% from 1994 to 2007, maybe that's just a different estimate? Hypertall (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Islam in Kazakhstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Islam in Kazakhstan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accusative Tone Against Minority Sect[edit]

Hello editors. I felt that this page had some accusative tone towards the Ahmadiyya minority in 2 locations. I've seen such language being discouraged in other articles, including the main article of the Ahmadiyya religious sect on Wikipedia, so I wanted the editors of a higher understanding of Wikipedia's standards - especially the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view standard.

The locations are:

  • reference made directly to "Ahmadiyya" wikipedia article as singular, described as plural, using point of view that people of linked article are "non-muslim" in the third sentence of the first paragraph, cited with the 4th source - There are also small number of Shia and few non Muslims.
  • non-neutral point-of-view comment added to 4th citation reference text linked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Kazakhstan#cite_note-4

If we could get this reviewed, that would be appreciated. Cheers. Jmeel14 (talk) 07:59, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Islam_in_Kazakhstan&oldid=1203011530"