Talk:The Nutmeg of Consolation

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is maintained by the Napoleonic fiction working group, which may be able to help with questions about the topic, as well as verification and sources.

Support. Unnecessary disambiguation. grendel|khan 21:25, 2005 May 6 (UTC)
Neutral to Don't Move Some of O'Brian's titles require disambiguation and it seems reasonable to have a certain consistency in the page titles with the added (novel) after all of them. Given that I am not completely set on that. Dabbler 23:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

The manual of style Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking says to put links at their fist occurrence. Is there any reason why this shouldn't be follwed here? Ingafube (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency in articles on the novels in this series[edit]

Ingafube I do not want to have an edit war over wiki links. Please read the talk page beginning here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Master_and_Commander#Working_on_the_21_articles.2C_raise_the_quality, where editors of the articles about the novels in this series came to some agreement on what constitutes a well-written article. Only the first novel has received the full treatment. One of the points was putting character links to articles on real historical characters or fictional characters on whom an article had been written in the character list. We all appreciate your interest in these novels, and hope you will come along with edits that will improve the articles, rather than adding further changes reflecting the notions of just one editor. I would like to put the wiki links as they were, on the promise that this will not be an edit war. So please do read that discussion. --Prairieplant (talk) 11:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]