Talk:Electric current

Physics Top‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives: 1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Exceptionally well written[edit]

I wanted to thank an editor who made all these beautiful referencess by using {{rp}} and {{r}} templates. Well done mate! Keep it up. As a side note I would propose to add coulomb per second formula for immediate clarity: C/1s = 1A/s. Best. AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 17:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exceptionality of physics formulas[edit]

I could only think that some physics and electricty formulas does have exceptionality in being "well written", either in November (whatever that means actually in Eisenstein nuclear science for civilian use), but I cennot get what is $ per second formula for immediate clarity?, a reductionism of Einsteinian formula and time-space calculations? --195.24.52.66 (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2024 (UTC) Alex on formulas [reply]