This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndustrialWikipedia:WikiProject IndustrialTemplate:WikiProject IndustrialIndustrial music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
I think this article should be rewritten, as there's more than one band having a 'Peel Sessions'-EP (examples: Carcass, Uzeda, Wire, Extreme Noise Terror, Autechre and lots of other bands). This article should therefore contain a list of links to other articles about the 'Peel Sessions' of the different bands or at least a note about this fact. -- Nightfall 14:57 Dec 27, 2002 (UTC)
Shoot, "Peel Sessions" has become a brand by now. Every band you can think of has a "Peel Sessions" record. I would recommend that this article be wiped out. Someone can go to John Peel's website and get a list of the Sessions. That would be a lot better. However, since this article is "Peel Sessions (EP)" I suppose we're down to just those groups that released an EP of Peel sessions, which is a shorter list. Geogre 12:52, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
For this reason have made the page a redirect to John Peel rather Prong, until such time as an article on the Strange Fruit Peel Sessions gets written. quercus robur 21:15, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with the article per se that I can see, so I've restored and moved it. --kingboyk 17:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
