Talk:Johann Aegidius Bach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

There is a slight problem here, as for example Google locates a "Johann Aegidius Bach" - but that might simply mean that the person who wrote *that* article got it wrong.

There are several articles which have the spelling "Aegidus" as here, and it's possible that several spellings were actually used at the time.

If someone can come up with a definite answer that's OK by me, but in the meantime I've reverted to the orginal. -- David Martland 21:59, 4 Sep 2003 (UTC)

This isn't definitive, but the Concise Grove gives "Aegidius". As you say, it's perfectly possible both were used in his day, but "Aegidius" looks more common to me. In any case, I'll make a redirect from Johann Aegidius Bach, and if we decide to move the article there later, we can. --Camembert
Philipp Spitta's 19th century biography of J.S. Bach gives the name as Johann Aegidius (also Ægidius) (vol. I, p. 23 and 174, Dover ed., 1951 reprint of 1889 ed.)--FeanorStar7 (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johann Aegidius Bach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]