Talk:Flag Fen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Capitalisation[edit]

I wonder if the second word should be capitalized? It seems like a proper noun. Michael Hardy 22:45 Apr 27, 2003 (UTC)

Yes, it is. It's the name of the site, not "a" fen as such. So I've moved it. Deb 21:32 Apr 28, 2003 (UTC)

Sources R Us[edit]

Why are there no sources for this article? Is anyone now allowed to write any old tosh and have it included or is this still meant to be an encyclopedia? 87.112.56.130 (talk) 07:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article reads a bit as if it said, "Oh, a bridge across the water, must have been religious!" when most bridges are actually quite practical affairs. Maybe people just wanted clean dry feet?

Maybe you had to pay (e.g. with the white pebbles or horses' teeth) or to fight the bridgeman, who would break your dagger in half if you lost?

There seem to be a lot of easy-to-think-of explanations that don't have to involve weird superstitions. The onus ought to be on the archaologists to discount other explanations first. Barefootliam (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Flag Fen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]