Talk:Wang Chongyang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Part of the problem with this page is that it really has two topics: Wang Chongyang the Taoist religious figure and Wang Chongyang the literary character based on the religous figure. I'm not sure if the best way to fix this would be to break it into two articles or to leave it one article but make the distinction more obvious.

The suggestion was made, then withdrawn, to keep it one article. I agree, the Wang Chongyang in the Jing Yong novels is clearly based on the historical figure-- it isn't a situation where they just happen to share the same name. I think we need a short introduction explaining who Wang Chongyang was and the probable reason why Jing Yong included him in the novels. Then we need to have a section on the real Wang Chongyang and a section on how he is portrayed in the novels.

Novel Character[edit]

The History section of the article seemed to focus on Wang Chongyang as a novel character according to Jin Yong. I made a few renditions and added sub-sections. I also added at the start of the history section a note saying that this is according to the Jin Yong universe. I think perhaps, the section heading "History" should be changed to something more appropriate so readers will know that this part focuses mainly on Wang Chongyang according to Jin Yong's novels. Any suggestions?

I'm just wondering, is there an actual difference between the real Wang Chongyang and the novel Wang Chongyang? Because when you say "based on the historical figure", it's vague. Is it just loosely based where Jin Yong took a few liberties with facts? Or is it really based on actual facts? Jute 04:55, May 25, 2005 (UTC)


Funny you should say that.[edit]

But Jin Yong really used sort of legends on Wang Chongyang in his novels. For example according to legend, Wang Chongyang really died twice. Some say that he used (Taoist) magic to return to the world.

Depends on what you mean by facts.[edit]

Like many religious figures, while Wang Chongyang was a person who really existed, there are also traditional legends about him that are difficult to back up with facts for one reason or another. (e.g. St. Augustine, after his death, swooping down out of heaven like Superman to save a baby falling from a balcony, etc.) The difficulty in the context of this article is distinguishing legends about Wang Chongyang from legends about Wang Chongyang that Jin Yong/Louis Cha made up on his own. That's why I suggested that we should try to keep the parts separate.

Otherwise we will be in the position of having an encyclopedia article about an important religious figure that is based on a novel. It would be like having an entry on Siddhartha Gautama (a.k.a. Shakyamuni Buddha) that is based primarily on the character in Hermann Hesse novel Siddhartha. But if we left out the stuff from the (extremely popular) novels, then we wouldn't be giving the whole story. We need both the traditional story and Louis Cha's expansions. Crypticfirefly 03:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I get you. I don't know much about Wang Chongyang really, except for what I read in Jin Yong's works so I guess what I meant by facts was the actual facts. I didn't know that he's really the stuff of legends that Jin Yong made him out to be. So yeah I agree with what you have in mind for this article. Jute 00:13, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

Do we still need the clean-up tag on this article?[edit]

Personally, I find the article to be okay now. What are your thoughts?

I think it is much better now. I am removing the cleanup tag as you suggested. Good work, guys! Crypticfirefly

I removed some edits[edit]

Some edits made on 19 December were inaccurate. For example, in the novel (both second and third editions), Wang Chongyang created the Big Dipper formation prior to his possession of the Jiuyin manual. So, he did not and could not use Jiuyin as an inspiration to craft that formation. Furthermore, in Shendiao Xialu/ROCH (both second and third editions) there was no mentioning that Wang Chongyang used Jiuyin as a blueprint to come up with newer techniques to counter the art of Jade Maiden. He just selected a few arts out of the manual and carved those in the tomb walls. However, he did create some random styles/techniques to deal with the art of Jade Maiden, but he could not create an entire set of new martial arts and gave up after three years. This happened about 15 to 20 years prior to the first Huashan Duel, this was shortly after Lin Chaoying died.

Wang Chongyang died in 1170[edit]

Yet in the section describing his life:

"In 1187, Emperor Shizong of Jin summoned Wang Chongyang's disciple Wang Chuyi (and, according to some sources, also Qiu Chuji) to preach in his inner palace. Later, he requested the presence of Wang Chongyang at his deathbed.[1] " the reference is from Tao107 - Wang Chongyang had been dead 17 years, could someone clarify or correct it? Sallysauser (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote that sentence, based on Tao's book - so either I misread Tao's text (most likely!), or perhaps the dying emperor wasn't aware that Wang had been long dead himself... I'll check on the source if I get to that library again. Vmenkov (talk) 16:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
7 months later, I got ahold of that book again, and I realize that I had indeed misinterpreted the passage. The author must have meant Wang Chuyi, not Wang Zhe. This is the actual quote from Jing-shen Tao's book (p. 107):

Wang Ch'u-i and Ch'iu Ch'u-chi, Wang Che's disciples, were summoned by Shih-tsung to his inner palace to preach. Later, Shih-tsung requested Wang's presence on his deathbed.

I have corrected the text accordingly. Thank you for catching this. Vmenkov (talk) 12:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wang Chongyang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]