Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mekh times

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 18:42, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Mekh times

No hits on Google, shockingly enough. Seems to be vanity. CJCurrie 00:44, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 02:06, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Rje 03:16, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable unless someone provides evidence for "It has been highly acclaimed by many people and has recieved numerous awards." Zzyzx11 04:23, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. There will never, ever be a source for "It has ... recieved numerous awards," because "recieve" is not a word. :-) /sɪzlæk˺/ 07:17, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.