Talk:Japan Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleJapan Airlines was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 24, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 31, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 13, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on January 19, 2010.
Current status: Delisted good article

Interior[edit]

Could anyone get the information on the interior of JAL aircrafts?? For example, Air France first class seating was designed by Contour Premium Aircraft Seating. Spyco

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Japan Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 October 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved including "Japan Air Lines Cargo Flight 1628 incident" as we already have "Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 1045". Regards, —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– There was a spacing in between 'Air' and 'Lines' as seen in the livery itself and it wasn't changed until the 1989 livery was used. And per our norm, we do also include a spacing such as Swiss International Air Lines, Delta Air Lines, Korean Air Lines etc. All above pages mentioned are affected. KlientNo.1 (talk) 03:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable, the article says the name changed in 2004. Not sure about Japan Air Lines Cargo in these titles it doesnt appear to be a seperate airline, the NTSB report for 1045 makes no mention of a seperate airline and it used the standard "Japan Air" callsign. . MilborneOne (talk) 07:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is this discussion doing here? it looked as though you wanted to move the Japan Airlines article. Putting it in the right place and making it clearer that the events in question date back to before the new livery would save people some time figuring it out. --Deeday-UK (talk) 09:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deeday-UK: Sorry, wasn't sure where to put it as there were so many articles to cover. And since we do have airlines separated from the main passenger airline such as Korean Air Cargo or Lufthansa Cargo, this will also probably come into that category. KlientNo.1 (talk) 12:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I moved the page of Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 8054 to Japan Airlines Cargo Flight 1045 because I'm not sure from which source did flight 8054 come from. Per official JAL source, it is flight 1045: [1]. KlientNo.1 (talk) 06:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Japan Airlines Cargo is not an official airline just a brand neither is Korean Air Cargo but Lufthansa Cargo is (seperate article and it has its own ICAO Code and callsign. So we really need to remove the cargo from the JAL ones. MilborneOne (talk) 08:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MilborneOne: Sorry for not responding in a while, was a bit busy. But I'm fine with removing the 'cargo' word from the article name. Although, guess we can do that for Korean Air Cargo Flight 6316 and Korean Air Cargo Flight 8509. KlientNo.1 (talk) 06:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support but Denied JAL Cargo per reason above. 101.10.2.232 (talk) 03:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support, including for Japan Airlines Cargo, which is the identical airline but qualified as cargo. Did a bit of OR on this and it seems quite clear that the airline was in fact called Japan Air Lines and not Japan Airlines, and considering that thi is clear on the lettering of all the photographs that show the fuselage I am not sure why it took so long for us to get to this point. Ex nihil (talk) 08:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Reassessment[edit]

Japan Airlines[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Fails GA criterion 2, as significant unsourced material is present; also violates criterion 4, with some overly-promotional writing. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not meeting the GA criteria in a few ways:

  • 5 cn tags, but some uncited passages not tagged
  • Self-contradictory statement in lead (which airline is biggest)
  • Not sticking to summary style. Contains many phrases like "On 7 February, several news outlets reported that", which rarely belong in encyclopedic articles.
  • External links in the body of the article. Femke (alt) (talk) 09:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Japan_Airlines&oldid=1207795030"