Talk:Holdout problem

Not NPOV statement

This creates a different, sometimes unfair, situation between holders of new bonds and those of existing bonds. In addition it may delay the restructuring process and ultimately reduce the resource and capacity of the country to repay its debt.

Phewee! "Unfair"? The country has defaulted! Which is the polite word for theft in this context. And the country has already demonstrated its inability to "repay its debt". A slightly more NPOV account of this must be possible. Paul Beardsell 03:20, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Good point. I have changed this to "unequal" which I consider more of a NPOV. --Vikingstad 09:01, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Not only government bonds

Exactly this same problem occurs with commercial bonds. Indeed the terminology is borrowed from ordinary commercial bonds. Defaults on sovereign debt being almost unheard of until Peru, Argentina and Russia. So the entire focus of the article is too narrow. When I get time I will have a go editing. Paul Beardsell 00:49, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This bond situation is merely one example of a much larger class of collective-action problems in which a few people try to extract above-average utility at the expense of the collective. Eminent Domain is a solution to another example, public development, recently in the news thanks to the controversial Kelo vs. New London decision. Refer to "The Calculus of Consent" by James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock for a wider discussion of the holdout problem. --Stephen Cobb <scobb_at_FreeStateProject.org> Also: http://www.freeliberal.com/archives/001168.html --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.218.67.254 (talk) 01:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Holdout problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928011313/http://www.telam.com.ar/english/notas/201307/39-a-belgian-court-ruled-in-favor-of-argentina-and-against-a-vulture-fund.html to http://www.telam.com.ar/english/notas/201307/39-a-belgian-court-ruled-in-favor-of-argentina-and-against-a-vulture-fund.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)