Talk:Inner peace

Spirituality Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Cleanup[edit]

Cute Andries, cute.... No way you will put this in cleanup. --64.81.88.140 15:21, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Please, try to be reasonable, the article does not even contain a definition, only quotes that should be moved to Wikiquote. If you do not want to have it on clean up then correct it yourself soon please. Andries 15:23, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No, you be reasonable. It is a {{stub}}. Give other editors a chance to expand on it. --64.81.88.140 03:28, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Andries. Do you have anything against "inner peace"? Why the campaing of debasing? --≈ jossi ≈ 17:57, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)

We have to get this discussion back on track and discuss the article, not each other. There are to my mind some valid criticisms of this presently inelegant article. A list of quotes doth not an encyclopaedic article make. Time will tell, and if it is worked up suitably that will be fine, but no one owns the articles here and editorial criticisms should be addressed dispassionately. Fire Star 04:44, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I agree in principle, but I must tel you that Andries and I have long history on WP of stepping in the other's toes. I have tried to stay away from personal confrontations, but has not been easy due to the opposite readings of the world than Andries and I profess --≈ jossi ≈ 05:45, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

The reason of the profuse citacions from many scriptures is that inner peace is an universal quest that pervades history trough this day. I think that it is best represented by quoting from these scriptures as well asfrom other teachers, philosophers and poets. I will continue more citacions from other religions and beliefs --≈ jossi ≈ 06:14, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)

Achieving[edit]

I think everyone should have inner peace and basic need be fulfilled, then we could start talking peace as in world peace. So the article could give some solutions for people to achieve inner peace. Just a sugestion. Roscoe x 05:12, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Insurance[edit]

I find it odd that this article says nothing of insurance, since the purchase thereof is often said to bring said 'peace of mind'. 67.171.222.203 (talk) 16:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC) insurance like Progressive? ;P[reply]