Talk:Mutant Enemy Productions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Didn't Joss disban the company?


I heard it was used as a tax shelter? Any info?--69.228.97.109 03:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Turok-Han[edit]

Were the Turok-han based on the Mutant Enemy mascot?

Monster speech[edit]

I seem to recall that after the "Hush" episode, the monster didn't say anything. Can anyone confirm this? Aumakua 21:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is true, I re-watched Hush the other day. Pic Editor960 (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serenity[edit]

Not sure who keeps putting Serenity back on the list, but it wasn't a Mutant Enemy production. It was a Barry Mendel production for Universal Pictures. I get that people want it here because it was Joss Whedon's movie, but then put it as a footnote which explains why it isn't in the actual list. Either this is a list of actual Mutant Enemy, Inc. productions or it isn't. One would think that if it's meant to be an accurate entry, it should be an accuate list. If so, ditch Serenity. Theonetruebix (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: The problem appears to arise by virtue of Wikipedia citing sources that themselves are inaccurate. If you were to sit down and watch the entire end titles of Serenity, you would notice that the words "Mutant Enemy" appear not a single time. All that appears is "a Universal Pictures presentation" followed immediately by "a Barry Mendel production". And that's it. Theonetruebix (talk) 19:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Five Nights[edit]

I removed Five Nights as one of the productions for Mutant Enemy since I've never heard of this project and there was no source link for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.132.8.88 (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mutant Enemy Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Here are some links I found to hopefully help with notability:

Logo/Typewriter/Credits -- https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/tv-production-companies/36515/the-stories-behind-tv-production-company-closing-logos — Preceding unsigned comment added by KirstynF (talkcontribs) 04:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The old logo should be kept on the page. It was notable in its own right, being featured in multiple other cultural works, cited and discussed in media outlets, etc. A substantial portion of the article is dedicated to it, so it still belongs here. Jbbdude (talk) 04:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A second IP user, from the same block of IPs (IPv6s registered to Comcast for Seattle with the same first 64 bits/network prefix/subnet prefix/site prefix and subnet ID), has edited the article to again remove the notable old logo. I'm not sure why. If any user has a view on removing the logo, they should discuss it here rather than engage in an edit war. Jbbdude (talk) 22:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]