Talk:Beer in China

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Structure of article[edit]

Ummm..... could we make this article specify what beer company it is talking about, at the least?

i think it's talking about chinese beers in general. so far theyre pretty unremarkable, but the Tsingtao Brewery article is the one about a specific company. Nateji77 05:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Tsingtao's market dominance earns it a paragraph to itself, but in the current version, following my restructure, I think it's clear that most of the article is talking about Chinese beers in general, not just one company. Rodparkes 02:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use of formaldehyde[edit]

Formaldehyde? What is the source of the author's information? This doesn't sound right to me. If it is, which specific Chinese beers contain this carcinogen?

See these articles from Chinese national newspapers: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-07/12/content_459503.htm and http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200507/15/eng20050715_196351.html Rodparkes 02:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know about beer. This Wiki article contain sensationalized stories implying the chemical is an oddity when it's not. Because the chemical is in many beers but at safe levels. According to Urban myths and consequently the same Chinese paper, formaldehyde appears naturally in any brewery process but no such chemical is artificially added to Tsingdao Beer as a stabilizer, according the local quality watchdog. And the SAQSIQ spot-checked 157 domestic beers and 64 foreign products from countries including the United States, Germany, Japan and the Republic of Korea and found that imported brands also contained 0.10 to 0.61 milligrams of formaldehyde on average per liter, compared with 0.10 to 0.56 milligrams for Chinese products. https://www.urbanmyths.com/urban-myths/food/beer-myths-is-there-formaldehyde-in-beer/ So why the generalized emphasis on a misinterpreted chemical that isn't all that unique to a single country. Unless the levels were too high which it wasn't.

http://en.people.cn/200507/17/eng20050717_196588.html

Additionally the report said that when within acceptable ranges, formaldehyde used in the beer industry would not harm health because it soon broke down during processing to negligible amounts. That's why foreign imported beers had it as well, but well below safety min levels. The media was quickly criticised for such sensational and loose misinterpreted reporting as it misleads people not well versed in the brewery industry. https://www.scmp.com/article/508386/watchdog-clears-beer-formaldehyde-fear Hence I don't think this Wiki article shouldn't even include such sensationalized media reports in the first place. Gurnardmexico66 (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New company[edit]

New company for evaluation: 莫干山泉啤酒有限公司 ("Moganshan spring beer limited company" of Deqing County, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China). Badagnani 19:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maize (corn)[edit]

Isn't some Chinese beer brewed with maize as an adjunct? The article only mentions rice and rye. Badagnani 06:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

Where is this information coming from? Is it a reliable source? It seems questionable. Rbritt518 (talk) 05:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's no good reason for 'taiwan beer' to be on this list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.170.120 (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also could we possibly get away from the Chinese stereotype of "Oh my god we were doing this soooo long before you". Based on the information provided, the Chinese were not brewing what we would consider beer. It was brewed, but many civilisations were brewing lots of things. Lets get specific.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 20:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Full disclosure: I've recently participated in similar discussions, but the outcome of this one is clear.[reply]

Beer in ChinaBeer in the People's Republic of China

  • This article is talking about beer in the People's Republic of China, so the accurate title is Beer in the People's Republic of China.
  • For example: The article telecommunications industry in ChinaElectronic information industry in China have also been removed to

Telecommunications industry in the People's Republic of ChinaElectronics industry in the People's Republic of China MacArthur1945 (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Beer in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]