Talk:Stained Class

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About the subliminal message[edit]

Reading the article it says the song says "Do it" twice when played backwards. Well I dunno about that, haven't taken the time to backmask it, but that isn't what i heard about the lawsuit and in the song itself. I never heard anything about playing it backwards, but if you play it regularly and listen close, at 2:32, right before it changes to 2:33 and right after he says "You can say what I only can see" You can hear someone say "Do it" very clearly in the background. I dont know if thats what the article is supposed to say, or it actually says it backwards too, so I dont know if it needs edited or not. --ARoomWithAMoose 02:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what? "Do it!" is like "hit it!" or "rock out!" etc. There is nothing suicidal about "do it" - for all those words mean, it could indicate "have another piece of chocolate fudge cake!" 50.111.6.33 (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Judas Priest - Stained Glass.jpg[edit]

Image:Judas Priest - Stained Glass.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Lots of point-of-view and weasel words here...clean up needed? Ed zeppelin (talk) 19:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - I don't think a 'large majority' considers this their best...either way, the the Sad Wings lyrics are on par with these anyways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.72.241 (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence in the introduction: "Stained Class is considered by many to be the last of the four "classic" Judas Priest albums."[edit]

The intro to the article says Stained Class is the last of their four classic albums. This means their first album Rocka Rolla is considered one of their best. I do not think this reflects critical or popular opinion. Martin Popoff, founder and editor of heavy metal magazine Brave Words and Bloody Knuckles and also the author of the book "Judas Priest Heavy Metal Painkillers", states that the 4 classic Priest albums are Sad Wings of Destiny, Sin After Sin, Stained Class and Killing Machine/Hell Bent for Leather. Encyclopedia Mettalum.com shows lesser user ratings for Rocka Rolla than the following four albums. I think this should be changed. Eternal abattoir (talk) 07:14, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artwork[edit]

Can someone add artwork to the page?Lukejordan02 (talk) 00:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stained Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Savage (Judad Priest song)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Savage (Judad Priest song). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]