Category talk:Religious faiths, traditions, and movements

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Religion

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles

Spirituality

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles

name[edit]

Rather odd name. How about "Religions"? —Ashley Y 21:21, 2004 Oct 19 (UTC)

I agree that the name of the category is unhelpful to the average reader who is looking for world faiths and organizations. "Systems" is too techno a word and not indicative of the content in a religious context. However, "Religions" was the previous name of this or a similar category, and it was confusing with its parent category, "Religion." I propose renaming this category to "Religious faiths, traditions, and movements". --Gary D 19:13, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)

Request for your aid dealing with actions from a user against Religious, Spiritual and Esoteric articles[edit]

User:Baphomet. is damaging Wikipedia: he his trying to label Religious articles as Superstition (from a POV view of positivism, that he calls Science). At the article Reincarnation he just went on to add to category "Superstition" and later on without discussion put a POV msg in the article. Please see the discussion page between both of us Talk:Reincarnation#Superstition.

Through the use of a Culture created by extremism in Science, he is clearly trying to do the job that the Inquisition did in the Middle Ages in a Culture created by extremism in Religion. He is damaging Wikipedia in a subtle invious way!

Please see also the Alert message I have created at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts#September_4, Thank you! --GalaazV 20:25, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User Page Listed as Article?[edit]

Having mistakenly attempted to speedy-delete the page listed as User:Digital20/Damon Huardism, before clicking that it was in fact a user page, I'm now wondering how it can be prevented from displaying here in the list. The reason being simply that it's obvious nonsense. The user has already had that content deleted as an actual article, but is apparently linking his User page here in order to continue showing it off. Presumably this is via a tag on Digital20's own page - which I presume (earlier error notwithstanding and now corrected) I'm not supposed to edit. Does anyone know a way of removing this page from the list? - Shrivenzale (talk) 01:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented-out the categories on that page. This is done by putting  around bits of a page that you want to make hidden or ineffective. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you. - Shrivenzale (talk) 00:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]