Talk:1799

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:22, 7 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)[reply]

Is the Assy McGee stuff really necessary? This just really seems to point out the poverty of the page's material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.233.99.57 (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleonic Wars[edit]

January 9 – British Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger introduces an income tax of two shillings to the pound, to raise funds for Great Britain's war effort in the Napoleonic Wars.

I find this suspect, or at least in severe need of clarification. Napoleon did not come into power until Fall 1799, and the Napoleonic Wars themselves did not begin until 1803, at which time William Pitt the Younger was not Prime Minister. This tax is not mentioned at all in the latter's page during his first premiership. There is no citation provided, can someone show one? I'm not saying this didn't happen, but at least from my understanding of the time period it seems at least highly reductive. If this tax was specifically created to fund war efforts against France, and was in fact instituted 9 Jan 1799, then at the time it was raised to aid in the War of the Second Coalition, which is not considered part of the Napoleonic Wars, because Napoleon had not become Consul yet. I just feel this probably should be reworded.

--129.7.0.24 (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Gilbert Stuart Williamstown Portrait of George Washington.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:07, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]