Talk:Biggin Hill

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Controversy / Background / POV[edit]

Biggin Hill is trying to be part of the big league and it wants to grow to be a bigger airport.

It is a competitive with London City Airport... some rivalry there. See ASA advertising issue.

Although Biggin Hill is within M25 and closer to London than Gatwick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.25.35 (talk) 23:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biggin Hill is in London, its the most southern part so its not surprising the devlopers want to expand the airport — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.38.254 (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think most residents would disagree with you! Biggin Hill has to win the award for least "London" out of any part of any London borough except for North Ockendon maybe! Justgravy (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

I will add a few photographs of Biggin Hill when i am authorized to do so and when i am back from holiday, any suggestions as to what to capture? --Muz (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty though the current Polesteeple Hill picture is, surely a better image would one of Main Road, as that is the main thoroughfare of the town? Jaruzel (talk) 08:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biggin Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708000343/http://www.bigginhillairport.com/UserFiles/100520.ccminutes.pdf to http://www.bigginhillairport.com/UserFiles/100520.ccminutes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]