Template talk:Nationality by occupation

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles

WikiProject Countries to-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Check out the article alerts; see if anything catches your fancy.
Cleanup : clean-up listing for Countries
Stubs : de-stub articles in Category:Stubs by region.
Other : add {{WPCountries}} to talk pages of related articles, and assess.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

Example[edit]

Example of how to use this template:

{{Nationality by occupation|Nationality=Albanian|Country=Albania}}

Category sorting[edit]

I don't see any reason to sort in this way rather than this way. We are well beyond the stage where by-occupation categories need to be set apart from the others that will be in every "FOOian people" category. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Akan people by occupation[edit]

Can someone who understands this template please adjust it on Category:Akan people by occupation so that it no longer appears in Category:Akan people? Timrollpickering (talk) 10:32, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Error behavior[edit]

I found some linty markup at Category:People from the Republic of Genoa by occupation that resulted from an empty Nationality parameter, and I copied and expanded the markup to Category:Sandbox/Lint, where the error behavior and its workaround can be seen. The template should be modified to behave gracefully on an empty Nationality parameter, and I put in the Goose example as well to spotlight that to someone who doesn't already know what's going on, usage is not explained very well. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]