Talk:Sarah Records

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bristol Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://web.archive.org/web/20010527083953/http://www.westnet.com/consumable/1995/07.14/revlabel.html

Untitled[edit]

I don't think the discography should be in this main article, so I created an external article with the full discography: Sarah Records catalogue warpozio 13:16, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be a mention of Are You Scared To Get Happy? fanzine and the flexidisc label Sha-La-La run by Matt and Claire?

So I once again removed : , "though the label always hated this tag, not just because some of the bands could scarcely be described as "twee", but also because it preferred to emphasise the politics of the label (attacking the capitalism and sexism of the record industry, both explicitly in text and more subtly and symbolically through the packaging and marketing of the records themselves)." because that is purely the objective defense of the record label by a fan, not something a reputable encyclopedia would have. (is wiki reputable? that's a different discussion.) I'm as devoted to my music as anyone, but this is pure conjecture, if you will. The literal fan boy defense, "how dare you verbally assault the greatness of my favorite label!! They weren't twee pop, they were a post modern recognization of the sexist political...blah blah blah." Save it for the sarah records forums, please. or the jo bros. whichever you happen to be using. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.211.173 (talk) 02:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]