Talk:USS Delaware (1820)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Delaware (1820) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

The tone of the article, probably copied from a Navy publication, is interesting:

"She served in the interests of American commerce and diplomacy in that area" and other sentences of this type. That's an interesting type of diplomacy, having a warship patrolling the coast of a foreign nation.

Anybody agrees with me? Sanders muc 21:18, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Very common in the days before telegraphs and UNs. The naval officer(s) were very often the sole representatives of their nations in the vicinity, and frequently had to be on hand to resolve kidnapping/shakedowns of merchant ship captains by corrupt local officials, to carry important mail, etc. The British, French, etc did the same off US coasts too. The detailed histories of the ships often go into details about just what the "interests" amounted to, all quite fascinating - see de Kay's book on Macedonian for a recent writeup. Stan 21:36, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks. Do you mind writing a bit about this at an appropiate place in the Wikipedia? If you do so tell me where. Sanders muc 22:42, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Yes, as I was writing my reply, I thought about how there wasn't something to link to - naval history would be the logical place to add. Stan 23:46, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

()s[edit]

Anyone know about the comments in ()s in this article like (sic) after something that looks OK, and (really?) under the carronades list? They belong there, or should they get ax'd? Thanx 68.39.174.150 04:23, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I don't know about the (sic), but the really is justified...I know of no ship of the line primarily armed with caronaded. --Stephan Schulz 18:06, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was done before the Delaware. See HMS Glatton (1795), an experimental RN ship-of-the-line which performed admirably in battle under the command of the infamous Captain Bligh. As there is a precedent for such an armament, and there is no evidence disproving the statement of the Delaware's armament, I am deleting the (really?) in the info box. --Auror 29 January 2007

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]