Talk:List of user interface markup languages

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of user interface markup languages for a record of this article's nomination for deletion; the result was to keep. Postdlf 02:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Confused[edit]

I'm confused about the heading "Initiative". What is it suppose to mean (in the context of this article)?

-- Charles Iliya Krempeaux

The ones who defined the schema. Most of the others simply copy their ideas, e.g. MyXaml copies XAML. Any better classification? --Minghong 19:34, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Classification[edit]

Why are items categorized under "third-party" and "mainstream"? --logixoul 12:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I changed "third-party" to "non-mainstream". --logixoul 17:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JSF[edit]

Should not JSF be included in this list? The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.225.72.125 (talk • contribs) .

asp.net[edit]

What is the xml called that asp.net uses? It uses the asp: prefix. (User:Narkstraws 15:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of user interface markup languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]