Talk:Cowboy Artists of America

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives of American Art Low‑importance

	Visual arts portal This article is related to the Archives of American Art. Learn more about this collaborative project about documenting the history of American art here.Archives of American ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Archives of American ArtTemplate:WikiProject Archives of American ArtArchives of American Art-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I've been trying to figure out how to link this up into the rest of the wikipedia. Right now it only links from the discussion page of Cowboy.

Considering the Cowboy Artists of America have their own museum, have had several books written about them, as well as at least one book/monograph per artist, and the fact that they are collected by many very serious collectors, they should fit into the scheme of things around here.

To be honest, Wikipedia is still very biased and imbalanced with regard to its content...

And of course you'd rather complain than do something about it, and can't be bothered to sign your criticisms. You might want to list it at List of museums. RickK 03:20, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's right. I created this page. And pretty much wrote it. I created the page on Ruffian (racehorse). And pretty much wrote it. I've added to the Secretariat (racehorse) page - and more than a trivial correction.

I've added to the List of Historical Horses page. And the Western Movies article.

And I've done other stuff.

Just because I didn't sign my name doesn't make my observation not legitimate.

In fact, this comment isn't signed as well. Again, it's the content of the observation that counts.

And because I made the observation and wrote it, you (RickK) came and read it. But instead of helping out yourself, all you did was make an even less constructive observation - ah, but you signed your name, so we know who you are.