This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A fact from KROQ Top 106.7 Countdowns appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Can someone explain to me if there's a reason why the phrase "reaches at" is in this article? That isn't a construction commonly found in English, but perhaps there's a specific reason it's in this article. Moncrief 01:00, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
Two questions:
Why are those particular songs mentioned? Are they more "notable" than the others? I'd assume that anything that approached the top of their lists is notable as far as songs go.
Shouldn't there be some mention in these lists about how these songs are chosen? It's certainly not on nationwide sales. Is it the DJs' favorites? The ones they play the most on that station? Requests on that station? As it is it could give the reader the idea that these are the overall most popular songs of each year (sort of like what Billboard supposes it does, discussion on the truth behind that another time). I think it needs clarification if it's going to be included in an encyclopedia. -R. fiend 07:16, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hey, I love the Go-Gos and the Bangles, but why are their pictures appropriate for this article? Taterbill (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gender balance. I put them in the section that describes how women were shut out of the top of the list. They were also popular LA bands that never made the top. --evrik(talk) 02:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but isn't that subtle editorializing? You are inserting your own opinion of who deserved recognition.Taterbill (talk) 15:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not editorializing. Its not about who deserves recognition. It's about trying to achieve some balance. Have you read, Women in rock? --evrik(talk) 15:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
