Talk:William Cavendish, 4th Duke of Devonshire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Old talk page post[edit]

I reverted the last edit by BGoldenberg, because traditionally we keep office boxes and peer boxes separate. john k 07:14, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Consistency about the "Two Days" & "Four Days" Prime Ministers[edit]

Please see Talk:List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom#The Two Days & Four Days Prime Ministers for discussion about consistency on how to handle the events of February 1746 and June 1757 on the various lists on ministers and ministries. Timrollpickering 22:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Form of address in Titles[edit]

We refer to him as His Grace The Duke of Devonshire. I can accept that. When he was a viscount, wouldn't the corresponding form of address have been His Lordship? Whatever it was, why have it for one and not the others? All or nothing, I say - I'd prefer nothing. -- JackofOz (talk) 02:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Date and place of birth[edit]

Noticed that the profile does not include a place of birth so thought I would do a bit of digging and came across the following quote in "The prime ministers of Britain, 1721-1921: with a supplementary chapter to 1924" By Charles Clive Bigham Mersey, Viscount Charles Clive Bigham Mersey p51 - both the month and place of his birth are un-certain. See the page at Google books here [1]. Just wondering where the 8 May date comes from and if we have a place of birth. Bjmullan (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems he was born in London according to some sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GS-216.1993 (talkcontribs) 18:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on William Cavendish, 4th Duke of Devonshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]