Talk:Guadalupe caracara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Google shows that this article is a direct copy of [1]. I'm rewriting it with other sources and more info.

So he shot it before he set off from America in 1920?

Rollo Beck? Yes, this is correct. There were none left when he left.Dysmorodrepanis 05:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed illustrations[edit]

There has been a discussion about the removal of two illustrations. I have collected them under a single headline. RhinoMind (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images removed[edit]

Illustration removed

Just to inform that Melly42 removed this 2 images. --Pixeltoo (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Please give a correct lable at Commons. Neither Brehm nor Audubon have known the Guadalupe Caracara (Audubon was already dead when the Guadalupe Caracara was first described) --Melly42 (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That it wasn't scientifically named doens't mean it wasn't known. The article also states it was common by 1876, the year given for it's naming. There's also the possibility that the year of description in the article refers to when it was moved from Polyborus. FunkMonk (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Guadalupe Caracara was discovered in the 1870s so Audubon was not able to illustrate this bird --Melly42 (talk) 15:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the images removed? When I look at them at WikiCommons, their copyrights have expired and they should be free to use. As I was reading the article, I was curious of this birds looks and its physical characteristics. At least I was glad to find two illustrations here on TalkPage, but shouldn't they be in the article itself? And if not, then why not?

I assume the discussion "Images" above is not about why the images was removed from the page, as it is concerned about the correct categorization of the images. Such a discussion belongs to WikiCommons, not Wikipedia. RhinoMind (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guadalupe caracara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]