Template talk:R from misspelling

Template:R from misspelling is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

Redirect Template‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects. This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.RedirectWikipedia:WikiProject RedirectTemplate:WikiProject Redirectredirect pages
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Categories[edit]

Why is this template a member of both Category:Templates for unprintworthy redirects and Category:Templates for printworthy redirects? – Uanfala (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: Because the template inherits those by virtue of transcluding its documentation, which has examples of both. I don't really see the point of "printworthiness" so I don't pay much attention to that. wbm1058 (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. Those are both categorized at the bottom of the template documentation. Anyhow, the documentation explains how a misspelling in one context may be considered a correct spelling in another context, and thus be "printworthy". I think it's all too convoluted and confusing. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:07, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:R from tpyo listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:R from tpyo. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Nardog (talk) 22:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Change display of correct form[edit]

If editor uses {{R from misspelling}}, then correct form should have link. Monniasza talk edits 08:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've definitely seen numerous cases where some knucklehead has "fixed" a link by changing it from [[Original misspelling]] to [[Correct spelling|Original misspelling]], if that's what you're talking about. A database report of this antipattern would be good. ―cobaltcigs 22:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does anything happen when a page with this template is linked from mainspace?[edit]

I'd think we'd want a bot to alert the linker that they may have made a typo, or at least add it to a database of links that could be fixed. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 03:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to construct this query with Petscan, but I failed. You might ask at Wikipedia:Request a query or a related forum to see if someone can write a quarry query for "mainspace pages that link to pages that transclude {{R from misspelling}}". – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested the other day here. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 20:17, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussions: WP:Database reports/Linked misspellings (current) and especially its talk, WP:Bots/Requests for approval/Archive 2#CJBot (2006), Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AntiRedirBot (2007), WP:Bot requests/Archive 50#R from misspelling typo/misspelling bot (2012), WP:Typo Team/moss#False negatives (2018). I also vaguely recall a tool for fixing such links semi-automatically, possibly part of WP:WikiProject Red Link Recovery despite the links being blue. Certes (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]