Talk:Battle of Taierzhuang

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Sure if the apostrophe is needed? Taier does not confuse as Xi'an. 大将军, 都督中外诸军事 (talk) 09:34, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I may be wrong, but the apostrophe has been present in other contexts I've seen this name (same with Ha'erbin). Maybe it has to do with the fact that 'er' is usually blended with the previous sound (nar, not naer). It indicates that this is not the case and no one's mistakenly insterting the 'e'. --Jiang 22:57, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)

It is needed. This is mandated by the Pinyin Rules.--222.28.170.65 08:37, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)Harmonico

Yes, indeed! See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Apostrophes Reilinger (talk) 08:32, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retreat?[edit]

This is a useful summary of the battle. But there is one important sentence that is confusing and possibly very wrong...

"Finally, the Japanese attacked frontally. A major encirclement on April 6, with Chinese reinforcements who could not stop the Japanese attack, preceded a major Chinese retreat, which the Chinese failed to capitalize upon through pursuit despite the pleas of European advisers who led the Chinese army."

This sounds as thought the Chinese failed to capitalize on the Chinese retreat, which makes no sense. I am not sure, but I seem to recall that this was a victory for the Chinese army. Perhaps the author can reexamine this posting.

137.150.37.220 (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.onesixthwarriors.com/forum/sixth-scale-action-figure-news-reviews-discussion/173179-chinese-nationalist-27th-division-dare-die-squad-battle-taierzhuang-1938-a.html

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/401946335469838927/

http://weaponsandwarfare.com/category/wargame/page/2/

http://weaponsandwarfare.com/2015/08/31/storm-over-taierzhuang-the-samurai-stalingrad-1938/

http://www.ebay.tv/sch/i.html?_sop=3&_nkw=chinese+medal

http://wiudwing.blogspot.com/2010/06/overseas-poster-pictures-ii.html


http://war.163.com/15/0427/09/AO6TATTL00014OMD.html

04:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Taierzhuang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Taierzhuang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete youtube ref[edit]

Hope is not my misunderstanding. Obviously there are many paragraphs in this article written by youtube. There should be a lot of content that is original research, so I suggest deleting it.--117.19.194.75 (talk) 14:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2022/05[edit]

This page uses multiple blogs and personal websites as sources.Since this is en.wikipedia.org, it is difficult for us to confirm whether those sources from zh are un/reliable.At present, some unreliable sources have been removed, so some content has no source.If unreliable sources continue to be added, those unreliable sources will be removed, and then remove unsourced content according to WP:BURDEN Rastinition (talk) 06:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About {{more citations needed section}}[edit]

We have no problem with content that does not cite sources can be removed.

I would like to confirm whether so much content on this page that doesn't cite reliable sources should be kept.At least,I don't want remove so much content(3 Level two headers) just because WP:BURDEN(Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source) .

In WP:NOTEVERYTHING, it says that A Wikipedia article should not be a complete exposition of all possible details, but a summary of accepted knowledge regarding its subject.I would like to follow these instructions to remove content.Can someone suggest what information should be kept on this page? Rastinition (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which is the correct spelling?[edit]

Why are the spellings "Taierzhuang" and "Tai'erzhuang" both used in this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:19, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article[edit]

In order to be properly encyclopedic, shouldn't we add a mention of the 1986 Chinese film Storm Over Taierzhuang (also known as The Bloody Battle of Taierzhuang), Chinese title: 《血战台儿庄》? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Taierzhuang&oldid=1205421985"