Talk:We the Curious

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the We the Curious article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bristol Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bristol, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bristol-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BristolWikipedia:WikiProject BristolTemplate:WikiProject BristolBristol articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	At least one photograph is included in this article
	This article has a map
	This article has an infobox

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

==Comment==

I have moved this from @Bristol, as this is the official way of writing it. The logo may make it appear to be spelled with an @, and it is commonly spelled like that, but the symbol in the logo is the whole word "at", surrounded with a circle in the style of @. The web site consistently writes it as "At-Bristol". Damn stupid name, either way. --Ascorbic 09:59, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

don't know if it's relevant but @bristol has been at the centre of a lot of controversy down the years, mainly because of it's sponsorship by Nestle and it's links to the Merchant Venturers. In addition I seem to recall that the original founder of the Exploratory whose name escapes me was not happy with the way his ideas were implemented.

Article Re-write[edit]

This article was a bit short, and had very little info in it. I've bumped up the content and, more importantly IMO, created sections for each attraction, which I hope will encourage others to contribute things they know about each. I've also created a couple of obvious redirects, 'At Bristol', and 'Wildwalk'. I'll be adding a few pictures soon. Any comments? _TheIslander 15:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

This should probably be mentioned somewhere: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pounds-97m-spent-on-silly-revamp-of-museum-1118365.html SmartSE (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Training session[edit]

A Wikimedia Training session was held here March 5, 2012. See: WMUK:At-Bristol_Workshop Leutha (talk) 22:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on At-Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on At-Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.at-bristol.org.uk/charity.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.at-bristol.org.uk/environmental.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.at-bristol.org.uk/savingenergy.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120403024554/http://www.at-bristol.org.uk/realbrain to http://www.at-bristol.org.uk/realbrain

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]