Talk:Canadian Soccer League

Football: American & Canadian Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Canada: Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Untitled[edit]

Anyone have a list of teams? Was this the league the Edmonton Brickmen played in, for example?

dont no, bring back the a pro csl.

The Edmonton Brickmen played in the original CSL which lasted from 1987 to 1992 and is discussed at the bottom of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Soccer_League This CSL is a different league. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.54.164 (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks, please note that I've just created the initial draft pages for 4 defunct teams: Durham Storm (formerly the highly successful Toronto Olympians), Durham Flames, Ottawa Wizards & York Region Shooters. You're welcomed to add-in more information on them! Henryong 05:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also created new pages for 4 more teams: Mississauga Eagles P.S.C. (defunct), Trois-Rivières Attak (2007 expansion), African Icons (2008 expansion) & Quebec City FC (2008 expansion). Henryong 05:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the page to reflect changes for the '08 season. Canadian Lions and Oakville Blue Devils now redirect to Brampton Lions (new page), as the team moved there this year. I've also updated the Brampton FC page to denote the franchise has folded due to the Lions' move. I have zero information on either FC Quebec (which appears to have been deleted) or the African Icons. If anyone knows about either one, have at it. Mtndrums (talk) 10:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this league actually professional? I thought most of the clubs were semi-pro? Lord Cornwallis (talk) 13:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History information[edit]

At this edit , article Canadian Soccer League (1987 — 1992) was merged in.
At this edit, article Canadian Soccer League (1987 — 1992) was split off. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to "Canadian Soccer League[edit]

Would it be an idea to move this to Canadian Soccer League and put a link in at the top of the page to the Canadian Soccer League (1987-92). I'd think the majority ofpeople looking for the CSL would be looking for the new one. Just a thought. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 01:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Canadian Soccer League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091011034441/http://76.74.187.100:80/~csl1690/CSL-ReserveDivision/ to http://76.74.187.100/~csl1690/CSL-ReserveDivision/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:14, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Canadian Soccer League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

I saw Walter Görlitz tagged this article for copyvio back in February 2020, and I'm having trouble identifying the problem. If Walter could provide more information, I would appreciate that. Is the referenced source itself a copyvio? Sennecaster (What now?) 13:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from my talk page.

@Sennecaster: I think you mean this edit. You'll notice that all of the tagged refs are to rocketrobinsoccerintoronto.com. That site reproduced the original sources, which was copyrighted material, and so in Wikipedia's eyes, that is a copyright violation. If we can link to the original source, press release, publication in a news source (like the CBC, the Globe & Mail, or even a local paper) or an archive of the original, both the links to rocketrobinsoccerintoronto.com and the tag can be removed at the same time. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. It's way less gnarly than some other ones the copyright cleanup is dealing with.. thanks for flagging it. Sennecaster (What now?) 22:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]