Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ellsworth

Ellsworth

final (20/0/0) ending 22:57 18 April 2005 (UTC)

Ellsworth, not to be confused with Emsworth, has been around for nearly a year and accumulated over 4000 edits. He has made valuable contributions to articles dealing with financial transactions, taxation, and law, areas where Wikipedia's content still struggles to be adequate. I think with his calm demeanor and open-minded approach to discussion, he would be an excellent administrator. His experience indicates an understanding of Wikipedia policy, and his user page shows that he understands the basic principles that underlie all our policies. --Michael Snow 22:57, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Candidate please indicate acceptance of the nomination here

Accepted, with thanks. Ellsworth 23:40, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Support

1. Not that being confused with Lord Emsworth is anything to be ashamed of, either. --Michael Snow 22:58, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
2. RickK 23:54, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC) A very prolific and worthy editor.
3. Support -German based articles looks very good. We need translators.--Jondel 00:03, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
   1. Um, actually, I don't know German. I just have looked at some German-language articles that looked like they had good material and were about topics that interested me, and put translation requests up. Then when translations were complete I'd come in and do some light copyediting, only as to grammar and syntax. Ellsworth
4. Sure. --Bjarki 00:04, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
5. Definitely. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:23, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
6. Support. - Darwinek 06:52, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
7. I've been very impressed with Ellsworth -- we've had some minor disagreements, and he's maintained a positive and constructive attitude throughout. RadicalSubversiv E 08:02, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
8. Merovingian (t) (c) 11:27, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
9. Support. Very valuable contributor. Pavel Vozenilek 00:32, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
10. Cool. JuntungWu 13:52, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
11. Zzyzx11 | Talk 16:52, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
12. Fine editor. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 17:03, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
13. Lst27 (talk) 21:55, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
14. Support- JCarriker 07:24, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
15. Of course. Neutrality^talk 16:05, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
16. Emsworth 19:17, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
17. Support. jni 19:20, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
18. Support - being a banker by profession, I have remained associated with financial matters and relevant law and taxation. I saw some of Ellsworth's edits and found them 'worthy'.--Bhadani 05:21, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
19. Support Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:28, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
20. Support. He maintains a level head and he deals with articles on politics? What's his secret? --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 20:12, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

• Ellsworth currently has 4360 total edits: 3693/487 to articles/talk, 9/80 to User/talk, 78/6 to Wikipedia/talk, 5 to Template, and 1/1 to Category/talk. —Korath (Talk) 23:18, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A. Dealing with vandalism and patent nonsense, helping with page moves, perhaps get more involved with votes for deletion.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. I haven't kept a "brag list", because mostly I've been doing a lot of editing of typography, punctuation, and grammar. As the nomination notes, I've been mostly contributing substantively to articles about law and finance. Two of the ones I've done most work on have been negotiable instrument and surety bond.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?

A. No edit conflicts over articles that haven't been worked out with a couple of posts to the article talk page. I don't get stressed, because I truly try to adhere to the philosophy set forth on my user page.