Talk:Berliner (format)

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled[edit]

The Christian Science Monitor has been using the berliner format much longer than the J&C cited in the article, anyone know how long though? —Preceding unsigned comment added by FozzyMaple (talk • contribs) 20:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed from "Berliner (newspaper)" to avoid confusion with the Berliner newspaper. -- Picapica 13:44, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why's the format called that, if the Berliner newspaper doesn't use it? --Oolong 11:39, 1 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added an explanation (and the reference I got it from) to the article - basically, it's "Berliner" as in "Berlin" (like Parisien or Mancunian or whatever) and dates way back before the First World War. - IMSoP 22:38, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Berliner format[edit]

Does anyone know the actual beginning date of this format?--84.152.187.226 15:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)gete[reply]

The place of origin is then, Berlin? I would love to know the specifics about the origins of the format! 86.56.152.251 19:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Half-berliner?[edit]

http://www.editorsweblog.org/print_newspapers/2007/04/uk_guardian_weekly_to_switch_to_smaller.php - not sure whether this is the same as "Compact" Snori 19:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Guardian in images[edit]

Confusingly, the two pics illustrating and comparing the Berliner format show The Guardian as an example of both a broadsheet and Berliner newspaper. This isn't actually incorrect (the paper was redesigned and changed format a few years ago) but is without explanation and will be puzzling to anyone unfamiliar with UK newspapers. A new image with a different broadsheet example would be clearer for most readers. --Ef80 (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewspaperSizes200508.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

	An image used in this article, File:NewspaperSizes200508.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Le-Temps-p1030243.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Le-Temps-p1030243.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]