Talk:Comparison of World War I tanks

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	World War I task force

This is a terrible table. GraemeLeggett 10:32, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Money where mouth is, it is getting better. GraemeLeggett

It was an extended labour and painful childbirth... Tank history needs more help, too. —Michael Z. 2005-03-21 16:10 Z

Origin of table[edit]

It seems to my eyes that this table was lifted wholeheartedly from the Site given as source. GraemeLeggett

I haven't seen the original (just tried to fix up the table), but I believe that raw data are not copyrightable. Unless we've substantially copied some additional creative work by the author; I think this is okay. —Michael Z. 2005-03-21 16:08 Z

The layout however poor was someome's work. Its evolving anyhow. GraemeLeggett

Amendments[edit]

I've done as many as my head can take for the time being. It needs the Mk II & III. Need to double-check number of m.g. per vehicle. The 24 infantry in the Mk V* was theoretical. The A7V armour wasn't mild steel. Have taken "Date Introduced" to mean "In Action." Not included U.S. M1917, since it wasn't used; probably needs footnote. Saint-Chamond title boxes need combining - the differences were superficial. More to come. Hengistmate (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]