Talk:Disturbing tha Peace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The picture that was here (Image:Disturbing Tha Peace Click.JPG) is low resolution, out of aspect ratio, and a possible copyvio. We cannot use this here. If there is to be a pic here, it needs to be clearer and fairuse (album covers work fine). --b. Touch 02:32, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

POV[edit]

A recent rewrite by Rcool35 gives a positive point of view instead of a neutral point of view. I fixed some of it but is the article biased and does it need additional fixes? Taylor Karras (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning?[edit]

The first sentence isn't even capitalized, and it really doesn't make sense. Is it just me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.146.137 (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bobby Valentino Cover.jpg[edit]

Image:Bobby Valentino Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:JackPot.jpg[edit]

Image:JackPot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shawnna block music.jpg[edit]

Image:Shawnna block music.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ludacris-red-light-district.jpg[edit]

Image:Ludacris-red-light-district.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Worthdaweight.jpg[edit]

Image:Worthdaweight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Willy block[edit]

Why is it that when I try to make a link to willy northpole's page it's blocked. If you just search willy northple you can find his page anyways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.233.162 (talk) 01:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny names[edit]

Are Serius Jones Lazy Eye Chingy real artists ?--Notedgrant (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection[edit]

There seems to be a lot of reverting back and forth, though it's not obviously vandalism, so I've add full protection for three days. Could the parties please discuss the issues here? If in fact it was vandalism, my apologies. Some diffs to that effect would be appreciated. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 09:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]