Talk:Metro Daily

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (279)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (988)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,325) • Stub-Class articles (6,687)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (403) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,239)

Untitled[edit]

I think the reason why the daily circulation of the Metropolis Daily is so great (that's up to 302,197 copies)because it's free of charge. In fact, it's not so informative because it only covers a little on each piece of news. For the details of the news, we also need to refer to other news media. But from the other point of view, it's helpful for people who do not have time to read the ordinary newspaper but they can also take a look on what's happening by reading the short article of the Metropolis Daily.

That is a good point that the article does not mention right now, so you should put it in. Fuzheado

Besides, I think it's not so clear for the general public on where to get the newspaper out of MTR stations. Today I searched around in Tuen Mun, I just cant find where can I get a copy of it. (maybe the web of Metropolis Daily should list all the location?!)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]