Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise

Star Trek: Enterprise has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 26, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 8, 2016.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Scott Bakula was the only actor considered to play Jonathan Archer in Star Trek: Enterprise?

Current status: Good article

Star Trek Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Reference ideas for Star Trek: Enterprise

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Braga, Brannon [@BrannonBraga] (November 29, 2012). "There was talk among some of us about doing the entire fifth season of #StarTrek Enterprise as a mirror universe. Your thoughts?" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 2024-01-21. Retrieved 2024-01-21 – via Twitter.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Porthos?[edit]

What, no mention of the Captain's best friend? 92.5.241.222 (talk) 12:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What, you mean like this: The Beacon Journal of Ohio interview with Berman and Braga "`Star Trek' heading to new space territory".

Although fan passion can lead to raging debates over the smallest Star Trek detail, reaction to the first part of Enterprise has for the most part been good, Braga said.
``We were really worried about the dog, said Braga, referring to Archer's dog, Porthos, who travels with him. ``We loved the idea of the dog because it was one of those myriad elements that humanize this crew. But we were worried that people would think, `Oh, look at this obvious ploy for sympathy.... '
``We were overwhelmed how positive people were toward the dog, he said. ``It's really astonishing. Everybody loves this dog.

I found that while looking for other sources, so maybe you or some other wikt:cynophilist could find someplace appropriate to add it ... or maybe the dog just isn't notable. -- 109.76.142.97 (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is information about Porthos on the character page for Jonathan_Archer. -- 109.77.204.50 (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect math in Intro[edit]

In the intro the article states that the end of ST:E marked an 18 year hiatus of no new star trek episodes. This math is incorrect, as the drought was from 2005 to 2017. I have attempted to rectify this mistake but have had my edits removed due to vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImagineColours (talk • contribs) 11:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly that sentence could have been clearer but User:ImagineColours somewhat misinterpreted the sentence. If you read it carefully you will hopefully see was trying to explain that the show had been running continuously for 18 years (TNG, DS9, and VOY overlapped, and ENT continued the 18 year long run) and then there was a gap. The positive point about a long run for the franchise was being emphasized, not the gap. (Tangent: speaking of long running shows the TV franchise Law and Order has been running for 30 years, the original ran for 20 seasons!) -- 109.76.130.202 (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saved by syndication?[edit]

In a March 2022, Scott Bakula expressed his belief that Enterprise would have run for a full seven years if it had been in syndication like other Trek shows. He said it in a podcast interview but it was also reported by [1] It seems like something that might be worth mentioning, not sure where best to add it though. -- 109.77.207.247 (talk) 05:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the edit with a reference here. I also removed the one liner that was just a link to this article. I appreciate the addition to the article; in the future, try to type at least a sentence about it. Users like to read the wikipiedia in context. Dillard 421♂♂ ^{(talk to me)} 00:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]