Talk:European Convention on Human Rights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disputed/invaded terorteses[edit]

On the map it shows the Crimea and eastern Ukraine as signatories is this still correct?

Which protocols are active?[edit]

The article states:

As of January 2010, fifteen protocols to the Convention have been opened for signature. These can be divided into two main groups: those amending the framework of the convention system, and those expanding the rights that can be protected. The former require unanimous ratification by member states before coming into force, while the latter require a certain number of states to sign before coming into force.

It should be stated which group each protocol is in. For example, one protocol abolishes the death penalty, and has not been ratified by three states. If the protocol is in the first group, unanimous ratification, it is not binding on any signatory of the treaty. If it is in the second group, needing a certain number of ratifications before being binding on all (similar to a USA Constitutional amendment) what number is needed?

Suggest each protocol be labelled as either needing all members to ratify to be valid, or needing only a certain number of ratifications to be valid, and what that number is.

A brief description of why the difference exists would also be useful. 2A00:23C7:E284:CF00:8537:A0E2:E05F:E95B (talk) 12:07, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anything on protection of liberty of movement and transport vs speed limitations[edit]

All nice to put speed limitations up to 30km/h if this is in the interest of public safetly. But limiting the speed on roads leading to villages and communes (not in the village and in the commune) to 30 km/h even at night? We are we supposed to deliver medicines during the night - but we cannot do that anymore for the actual prices if we have to reduce our speed in the night to 30km/h? Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]