Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing/Controversial articles

Computing Project‑class

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please watch this page for comments on articles which need peer review.

What format? Like this? List the links, then add comment?

subprogram

Wikipedia encourages editorial action, merges and redirects.

List with quick comment on what to look for seems enough for here - the rest can go on the talk page of the article unless it's the same issue happening on many articles. JamesDay 03:12, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Iterative and Incremental development looks OK. Just deleted a repeated paragraph. 169.207.115.74 22:04, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Abstraction (computer science) -- started at the top of the list. disagree with the first sentence, which is really refactoring and not abstraction per se. Proceeding to the talk page of the article. 169.207.115.74 22:11, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Class (OOP) - based on Tim Starling's comment, will pass on the page, and move on to next page on the list 169.207.85.65 11:54, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Object-oriented programming looks OK to me. 169.207.85.65 17:23, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Thread (computer science) looks OK 169.207.85.65 17:26, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Method (CS) -- content belongs under OOP. Method is an OOP term.169.207.85.65 18:02, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)