This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Asia (Roman province) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Comments[edit]

Untitled[edit]

In general hello I think that the article is good and informative, but I do have a couple of suggestions. In the first paragraph, you might want to add "211 BC" so we are clear from the start what time period is being referrenced. Also, I would suggest maybe moving the geography section up, or at least painting a better picture of where the province is up front, again to establish context from the start. I think providing more wiki-links would also be really helpful. Providing wiki links for people (Mithridates VI, Attalus III) will allow you to reference them w/o spending a lot of time describing who they were and what they did. This could also be helpful for places and sub-regions as well. ALl in all, a very solid article though.65.185.189.131 15:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Dan Frydman (5/12/2007)[reply]

This is a very informative article. You may want to add some references citing the information you have found. Also, a better map would be very helpful in visualizing the area. Also, maybe provide the wikilink to Gaius Gracchus' page. NGupta07 21:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good thorough article, but there are a few things missing. You may want to add on a references section and put in some in text citations so the reader knows which information came from which sources. Also, some wiki-links in the longer text sections would be helpful. Also, the section title "apathy and exploitation" is a little vague and could be retitled to something more specific.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Llewsor (talk • contribs)

Very solid and detailed article; some of your sentence structure is a bit confusing and could be improved. Overall, very good job.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Anisekstrong (talk • contribs)

Move[edit]

The editor who moved this here has just begun: the rest of the Roman provinces are at Roman province and need to be brought into conformity with this new styling, viz. Achaea, Roman province, Aegyptus, Roman province etc. The briefest look shows what a hodge-podge has been assembled. Thank you.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wetman (talk • contribs)

Geography[edit]

It would be helpful if the Geography section mentioned a single line relating the Roman province to current nations and national boundaries. EaswarH 02:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easwarno1 (talk • contribs)