Talk:Charles McCarry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I couldn't make head or tails of this article. If I didn't vaguely suspect there was something redeemable in it, I would not hesitate to consign it to the Bad jokes bin. I'm sorely tempted to blank it... In any case, I really have no competence or inclination to tackle this article, except maybe to blank it, but then again... -- Cimon Avaro on a pogo stick 11:36 12 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Changed my mind. I'll have a go. Cimon Avaro on a pogo stick 18:56 12 Jun 2003 (UTC)

I removed the "Unreferenced" tag. Most of the information can be found on the inside cover of his books, but now there is a whole interview to draw information from. Kraxler 19:02, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weasel word cleanup[edit]

I've attempted to cleanup the paragraph tagged as containing Weasel Words. Rather than me removing the tag I'd appreciate it if someone else can review the changes and remove the tag if deemed acceptable. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 04:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles McCarry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite[edit]

Hi all. I fancy attempting to re-write this article to try to make it in some way useful. I'll start shortly and will edit one section at a time. I welcome comment or assistance as I go. Carlton25 (talk) 11:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is an idiosyncratic personal essay, not a Wikipedia entry.[edit]

I have to agree with the alerts posted at the opening of this article. This piece, while interesting, is filled with opinions and personal observations, rather than consisting of facts that can be traced to established sources. Just a few examples: heads such as "How McCarry responded to the Accepted Wisdom of his time" and "Can and Should Journalists Serve as CIA Operatives?"; the strained comparisons to Mailer, Hemingway, Salinger, et al.; comparing the Paul Christopher novels to "a Christopher Nolan movie." NicholasNotabene (talk) 11:50, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]