Talk:California mission clash of cultures

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 10 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gigithescholar.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective of the Indians[edit]

I propose that this article could be improved with a bit of a rewrite, to give a better balance between the cultural points of view of the two sides of this 'clash'.

For instance, the article could describe the status quo of the culture prior to the entry of the Europeans into the Alta Californina. And, the global political context that was part of the Spanish motiviation to colonize Alta California. I don't want to "step on toes" and am willing to discuss this and collaborate with other editors. BruceHallman 15:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce, I have a fair bit of source material that can be used to expand the article as you suggest. If you'd like to take the first crack I'd love to help!--Lord Kinbote 23:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It does appear to be a bit biased. While I am not a fan of the Spanish empire and believe that the native peoples should have been left alone, I am also quite aware that the native people living at the missions outnumbered the friars and their guards (only six of them at Capistrano) by more than one hundred to one. They were not routinely chained or whipped. Nothing could have prevented anyone from leaving if they wanted. So why were they so passive most of the time? Was it cultural? Was it simply a matter of lifestyle? As I heard a docent at Capistrano tell fourth graders, "Would you want to live on pounded acorns, or on meat and vegetables?" Or maybe it was something else.Scott Adler (talk) 07:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Horribly outdated[edit]

There is much new research on the relationship between the Spanish missionaries and the native peoples. The perspective offered here--that the "latest" research shows that the Spanish were a cruel and heartless--is one of the seventies and eighties. More recent research gives a rather more balanced picture. The foreword to Craig H. Russell's latest book offers some resources. I don't have time to delve into this subject, but I hope that someone else might. InFairness (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The well-documented cutting off of hands, starvation, and enslavement into forced labor of indigenous Californians by the missionaries seem "cruel and heartless" to me. [1] [2] [3] -Uyvsdi (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Rename needed[edit]

A "clash of culture" implies a somewhat even-handed collision in which two groups view for some accommodation or agreement. This couldn't be farther from the truth. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 04:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on California mission clash of cultures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on California mission clash of cultures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]