Talk:Flatterland

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I added a paragraph explaining the puns Victoria Line, Albert Square and "Hawk King". For British readers this is probably redundant, but worth spelling out for other readers? Interested in others' reactions.

--Cje 08:08, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

That's a great addition Cje, i read the book , and actually owned a copy of it. Very good book, i'm a math ph.. student and enjoyed it very much. What do you think about ading more information about the plot? Maybe explain some of the "characters" with links to the math theory behind them?

Cjrs 79 21:29, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Well, I'm willing to have a go - but first I'll need to buy/borrow a copy of the book! I have a copy of Abbot's Flatland, but not of Flatterland. I read it a few years back and, like you, enjoyed it very much. If anyone with a copy wants to get started ......

--Cje 17:30, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I'll add a character/plot summary (assuming i remember) when i get my copy back--i loaned it to a friend.

--Caleb 1:57, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Mistakes?[edit]

As I recall, the Space Hopper states that the Mandelbrot set is not self symmetrical, however, in reality it is. Perhaps I am mistaken; it's been a while since I read the book. However, if I am not, is this worth adding to the article? 10nitro (talk) 05:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are not mistaken, but that is not worth adding to this article. 29 April 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.115.77 (talk) 07:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]