This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
The beginning of the page does not include Jaffa as a Philistine city that was mentioned by the Bible, contradicting Jaffa's own Wikipedia page. Just wanted to call attention to this!
@Tombah, Yezohs, and Demetrios1993: Should this article use BCE or BC? There have been some recent edits trying to change the page from one style to another, but as can be seen in this diff, there was no consistent style to begin with. Both styles were used in different parts of the page.
Personally I support using BCE in this case, since it's more secular and the topic has nothing specific to do with Christianity. Also, recent archaeological and historical sources generally use BCE. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 11:59, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Potatín5: According to MOS:ERA: An article's established era style should not be changed without reasons specific to its content; seek consensus on the talk page first (applying Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Retaining existing styles) by opening a discussion under a heading using the word era, and briefly stating why the style should be changed. I'm actually just following the guideline here by opening a discussion.
Again, recent scholarly sources about the Philistines, and the ancient Near East in general, tend to use BCE. That includes the sources used in this article too. And parts of the page have been using BCE for several years now (at least since 2016), so there has clearly been no strong consensus to use BC in this article. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 21:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I support BCE as well Yezohs (talk) 12:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, i am indifferent as to which era style we are going to use. Personally, i tend to prefer BCE–CE. Having said that, i reverted User:Zime2005 because the BC–AD era style appeared as established, and they didn't provide any reason whatsoever for changing it; even after i informed them of the relevant guideline. They did the same in Pericles and Template:Timeline of Pericles' life. Demetrios1993 (talk) 03:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It has been over 24 hours, and there is apparently a weak consensus to use BCE (or at least no consensus against it). Thanks for the comments —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 12:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The MOS:ERA states, as mentioned above by @Potatín5, that an articles should not be changed without reasons specific to it's content. This article was established as a BC/AD article and we should refrain from changing the ERA style to avoid a revert war. To address @Trilletrollet statement about this article having "nothing to do with Christianity" the BC/AD era notations are not only used for dating Christian events, it has been a widely used secular dating system for many centuries. If no one has a compelling argument to change the ERA from BC/AD i will revert the incorrect change as per the Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Retaining existing styles article. Paokara777 (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This article undermines the true significance of the Philistines. From their mass trading with the Phoenecians and Egyptians to their control of the Via Maris trade route. Not only that, but their significance was very influential that the name Palestine for the region is derived from them. They were an advanced and sophisticated peoples, known for their complex naval systems like the Phoenecians. They also wer eome of the first civilizations to invent a monetary system.Nickal06 (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
_01.svg){kind=small}
