Talk:Klutz

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

VfD Debate[edit]

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Jun 23 to 29 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:

Dictdef. RickK 06:28, Jun 23, 2004 (UTC)
Keep as this a fairly well used term, and I certain something more than a dictdef will come of it. Burgundavia 10:05, Jun 23, 2004 (UTC)
Keep, ditto. Hey, there's even a well-established series of how-to books entitled "Klutz Guides", starting with "Juggling for the Complete Klutz." Dpbsmith 12:42, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I tried to rewrite it into a keepable stub. I think it can be expanded upon. Let's keep. blankfaze | •• 17:26, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Important Yiddish contrib to English. jengod 22:09, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)

End discussion

2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message[edit]

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a term in Icelandic "klaufi" with the exact same meaning, it's probably a related word, should this be added?

Publisher name no coincidence[edit]

I take issue with the sentence, John Cassidy has used the coincidence of the name of the publisher and the Yiddish word to exploit the title in some of his books, for instance Juggling for the Complete Klutz. I believe the name of the publisher arose from the title Juggling for the Complete Klutz, their first book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.171 (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]