Talk:Ruy Lopez

Chess High‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is in the list of selected articles that are shown on Portal:Chess.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by .

Open Games Bad Link[edit]

The Open Games link (4th link under History) goes to an open source software Wiki entry instead of Open (pawn structure) Chess games, which is an entirely different thing (2. Nf3 3.d4 is the "Open" Sicilian, having nothing to do with open source software code). Open games are sharp with complex variations in most lines. I can't find an Open Games (chess) entry in the project yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.202.139 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 9 September 2009

After Main line alternative 5...Be7 Nc3[edit]

How about this move? i believe previous world champion spassky played this move a couple of times in '88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrussianDream (talk • contribs) 11:20, 29 July 2009

Erroneous citation in the Berlin defense Rio gambit[edit]

Since Black's third move does not threaten to win the e-pawn—if Black captures it, White will win back the pawn on e5 [57]

There is nothing at all like that on page 52 of the 2003 edition "Play Winning Chess", as reference [57] indicates. The entire page is wholly dedicated to explaining the en passant rule. This citation should be fixed (or better, replaced with the lines that prove the author's point here).

108.45.46.243 (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

3...Bd6[edit]

Does it have a name? It's been played a few times starting with Stanley-Schulten 1846. It's less ridiculous than some of the openings people try to add to wikipedia. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone know why it's called the Martinez Variation?[edit]

Obviously it's a common surname, but I don't know of any famous chess players with that name. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK I found this game, but it wasn't the first appearance of 6.d3 (a fairly natural move) and I never heard the term "Martinez Variation" until the 2023 World Championship. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 10:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]