Wikipedia:Wikifun/Round 5/Answers/Question 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There must be a lot of such towns, Rochester, Ulster County, New York has even smaller density - 30.5 ppl/km^2. Grue 15:19, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Although some googling (77.5/km site:en.wikipedia.org) reveals Wooster, Arkansas being quite close to requirements. Grue 15:36, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The density number is exact and straight from the article. -- AllyUnion (talk) 17:30, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Possible answer[edit]

Well, there's Murray, New York, pop. 6259, density 77.9/km². That isn't exactly what you specified, however, so I'm continuing to search. --Marnen Laibow-Koser (talk) 20:39, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Further clarification[edit]

The total area is between 80 and 100 km, and the population is greater than 6,000. -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Ok, I am going to give this a last stab and say that 77.59 was misprint and guess on Yamaga, Oita with a population of 8,590 and population density 59.77(!). Ok now I'm giving up. I'm going to sleep. Gkhan 01:12, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)



To further narrow the search (I think Google isn't really giving good results at the moment), the article in question is a stub. -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:47, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Still not helping, really... I've used four different search engines and I still can't come up with anything. On a slight aside, MSN has already indexed this question; it's one of three results for "77.59". Johnleemk | Talk 09:09, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Not really helping much, but I'm guessing that the population density isn't on the page itself, but you took the population/land area to get the figure? Searching on google "small town" +stub restricted to wikipedia has not yet yielded much results. Ahh, the frustration -- fiveless 16:42, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, but AllyUnion said that the density number is "straight from the article." There are loads of stubs about towns of all sizes all around the world. Sigh. FreplySpang 16:51, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I think the town is in Japan, not US (they have two digits precision for density), but since 99% of Japanese towns have 2003 data, it leaves only small room because Ally said it was as of 2004. Grue 17:08, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Getting warmer. -- AllyUnion (talk) 19:04, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that I've found a golden mine of such towns. As I expected they're uncategorized (except stub category). I think I'll have an answer by the end of the day ;). Grue 08:52, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

GOT IT!!![edit]

Yeah, I've found it! It's Naie, Hokkaido. Here is how I've found it.

  1. Check Category:Towns in Japan randomly. Realize that most of the towns have 2003 data.
  2. Google for "As of 2004" "the density of" site:en.wikipedia.org
  3. Check Osaka and Ehimi prefectures. Fail.
  4. Check Hokkaido prefecture at random. Three towns. 2004 data. _VERY_ suspicious!
  5. Notice Hokkaido has subprefectures. Each subprefecture article is a list of districts and towns in them. That's what I want.
  6. Tediously check each town in subprefectures starting from Tokachi Subprefecture (the last one).
  7. Tokachi: no result, Soya:no result, Sorachi: got it!

Grue 09:03, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Damn this is ridiculous. Just when I found the answer I realize I failed the deadline by 9 hours :(. Grue 09:07, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)