Talk:1956 Summer Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Therefore, these events were held in Stockholm (Sweden) marking the second, and so far last time, that events of the same Olympics were held in different countries.

Untitled[edit]

When was the first time? This says that 1956 was the only time that the Olympics had not been held in a single city/country. whkoh [talk] 12:00, May 23, 2004 (UTC)

Southern Hemisphere Concerns[edit]

Is it really appropriate to categorically state that there were such broad concerns about hosting the games in the Norther Hemisphere's winter when the final round of voting was between Melbourne and Buenos Aires, another city in the Southern Hemisphere. It doesn't seem as if the voters minded at all.Dhicks3 (talk) 06:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco?[edit]

Why didn't San Francisco get a vote candidate? It didn't enter round 1.

What the?[edit]

This article says that Bejing (China) and Hong Kong will be co-hosting the 2008 games. Is this verifiable? I think it's incorrect but I will not change it until that is confirmed. Smartyshoe 20:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong is the "Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China" - not a separate country from Beijing and the Republic of China. One country is hosting the 2008 olympics. Beijing is the host city. Some events will be in Hong Kong. The situation is not similar to Sweden and Australia hosting the 1956 Olympics.--A Y Arktos 21:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's somewhat murky. Hong Kong has a different National Olympic Committee (NOC) than the PRC (i.e. HKG and CHN respectively). Also, elsewhere in Wikipedia (see List of countries), Hong Kong is defined as an "entity considered to be a country". It is obviously not defined as a sovereign nation, but appears in the list of special entities recognized by international treaty or agreement, which is one kind of "country" as per the first article. Andrwsc 22:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

only cities can host Olympics not countries>>>>>>>>> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.51.71.204 (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Television[edit]

There should be a section on the introduction of television into Melbourne to coincide with the Olympics. Rogerthat Talk 09:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Olympic Underwear Relay[edit]

Could this stunt (http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/pranks/olympic.html) possibly be verified? I think it might be worth including in the article.

Which Pollies?[edit]

Does anyone know exactly which Premier and PM are referred to in the 4th paragraph? I'd like to link them to the specific person rather than just the page on those positions. FiggyBee 14:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Olympic logo 1956.gif[edit]

Image:Olympic logo 1956.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1956.jpg[edit]

Image:1956.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1956.jpg[edit]

Image:1956.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


POV[edit]

"Once the games were underway, though, they certainly went well. The Aussies were excellent hosts, both friendly and efficient." Is this really acceptable to write in Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.166.227.38 (talk) 22:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. And I'm not gonna erase it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.4.123 (talk) 03:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Continental Hosting[edit]

The first paragraph stated that the Melbourne games were the only Games hosted outside of North America or Europe until Sydney 2000; this is incorrect (Tokyo 1964 and Seoul 1988). The paragraph has been corrected to add Asia to the list of host continents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.6.146.58 (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article name...[edit]

The official Olympic website the games of 1956 states the games as Melbourne/Stockholm. I suggest that in the infobox the name follow. 01:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Moonraker0022 (talk)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]